It all began with a isolated photograph, perhaps the most significant ever taken of a member of the monarchy.
There stood the Duke of York, with his arm around a young woman, while a companion grinned suggestively in the backdrop.
Absent that photograph, captured at a social event in 2001, it would have been difficult to accept the allegations of a teenager who stated she was transported across the sea and compelled to have cursory intimate contact with a prince of the royal bloodline?
A curious, telling move by someone who had publicly stated to have not been aware of her, asserted he could no have had intimate contact with her, and yet provided a substantial sum of his mother's money to settle a long-delayed court action.
Considering this, conversations of the royal family acting firmly to cut Andrew off are wide of the mark. This affair has persisted for the largest portion of 15 years since that photograph, and a further image of Andrew strolling pleasantly with a convicted sex offender emerged.
Journeys were listed in public records: helicopter flights from the palace to a sporting venue and back again in time for midday meal, exclusive air travel instead of regular transport, all for the benefit of "the frequent flyer".
Additionally the entitlement which demanded subservience when he entered a room or the profound consciousness about his royal titles used on his letterheads in letters to his friends.
He could get away with it while his mother, who inexplicably pampered him, was still living. The sovereign did at least strip him of royal responsibilities and military positions in the aftermath of his ill-fated and, as revealed, mendacious media appearance six years ago.
Merely in the last two weeks that events progressed rapidly, following the issuance of books giving more disturbing details of his conduct and that of his connections.
Further disclosures have again exposed Andrew's thinking that he could escape lying about his interaction with a disgraced individual.
People (and the press) were far more perceptive of the monarchy. There was no one of any significance to speak up for him, a result of all those years of presumption.
The more astute royals realized that. The one imperative is to hand down the institution, if not as before at least intact and unstained.
For generations the last 190 years trying to undo the legacy of earlier rulers, proving they are useful, dutiful and reactive to their people.
He was placing all that in danger in an age when submission and privacy is no longer adequate.
Finally, the well-known uncertain king was pressured more. There was no alternative. The royal household had lost control of the narrative.
Currently the stripping of designations and the continued and lifetime social disgrace that will pain Andrew the most.
He remains a royal advisor, in principle able to act for the king, and he is still in the succession to the monarchy, but not any of these will truly come to pass.
Will people he meets still defer to him? Could they still make mistakes and call him Sir? Might they say Sir,
Of course, he is not retiring to an ordinary town, but to the monarchy's extensive property at a royal residence.
There, he will be provided by the monarch with one of the grace and favour houses and given some sort of personal stipend.
This differs from his prior accommodation, where he paid a nominal payment for more than 20 years, and Norfolk is a bit remote, but even so it may not be far enough.
The situation continues. There are still files in the custody of US Congress to be made public.
Possibly for the moment the harm to the monarchy to the crown is contained. The statement from the royal household was plainly that the removal of designations was what the king, and particularly other senior family members, desired.
An end to illusion that Andrew was acting willingly. And, significantly, the brief communication showed plainly that the monarchy were aligning with the complainant's account of incidents.
Furthermore, for the premiere occasion they ultimately showed regard for the victims: "The measures are deemed necessary, despite the truth that he continues to deny the claims against him."
In the end it is presumption, self-seeking and inactivity that will kill the institution. In his folly, self-indulgence and venality, Andrew gives the impression never to have learned that lesson.
A tech enthusiast and business strategist with over a decade of experience in digital transformation and startup consulting.