Ken Burns is now considered more than a documentarian; he represents an institution, a prolific creative force. Whenever he releases television endeavor heading for the small screen, everyone seeks a part of him.
The filmmaker completed “more fucking podcasts than I ever thought possible”, he notes, nearing the end of nine-month promotional tour that included 40 cities, dozens of preview events and innumerable conversations. “With podcasts numbering in the hundreds of millions, I feel I’ve participated in a substantial portion.”
Happily the filmmaker is incredibly dynamic, equally articulate in interviews as he is prolific while filmmaking. At seventy-two has gone everywhere from historical sites to popular podcasts to promote his latest monumental work: this historical epic, an extensive six-episode, twelve-hour film project that consumed ten years of his career and premiered this week on public television.
Similar to traditional cooking in today’s rapid-consumption era, Burns’ latest project intentionally classic, evoking memories of The World at War than the era of digital documentaries new media formats.
For the documentarian, who has built a career exploring national heritage including baseball, country music, jazz and national parks, its origin story is not just another subject but fundamental. “As I mentioned to directing partner Sarah Botstein the other day, and she agreed: no future work will carry greater importance,” Burns contemplates during a telephone interview.
The filmmaking team plus scripting partner Geoffrey Ward utilized numerous historical volumes and other historical materials. Multiple academic experts, spanning age and perspective, contributed scholarly insights in conjunction with distinguished researchers representing multiple disciplines like African American history, Native American history plus colonial history.
The film’s approach will feel familiar to devotees of The Civil War. Its distinctive style featured slow pans and zooms across still photos, generous use of period music and actors voicing historical documents.
Those projects established Burns built his legacy; years later, presently the respected veteran of historical films, he can apparently summon any actor he chooses. Appearing alongside Burns at a recent event, renowned playwright Lin-Manuel Miranda noted: “Nobody declines an invitation from Ken Burns.”
The decade-long production schedule also helped regarding scheduling. Recordings took place in studios, in relevant places through digital platforms, a method utilized during the pandemic. The director describes working with Josh Brolin, who found a few free hours in Atlanta to perform his role as George Washington before flying off to his next engagement.
Brolin is joined by Kenneth Branagh, Hugh Dancy, Claire Danes, respected performing veterans, diverse creative professionals, multiple generations of actors, accomplished dramatic artists, Damian Lewis, Laura Linney, Tobias Menzies, skilled dramatic performers, small and big screen veterans, Dan Stevens, Meryl Streep.
Burns emphasizes: “Frankly, this may be the best single cast recruited for any project. Their work is exceptional. Their celebrity status wasn’t the criteria. I became frustrated when someone asked, ‘So why the celebrities?’. I explained, ‘These are artists.’ They represent global acting excellence and they animate historical material.”
However, no contemporary observers remain, visual documentation required the filmmakers to depend substantially on the written word, integrating the first-person voices of nearly 200 individual historic figures. This methodology permitted to show spectators beyond the prominent leaders of that era along with multiple essential to the narrative, numerous individuals remain visually unknown.
Burns additionally pursued his individual interest for maps and spatial representation. “I love maps,” he notes, “and there are more maps in this film than in all the other films throughout my entire career.”
The team filmed at numerous significant sites throughout the continent plus English locations to capture the landscape’s character and worked extensively with living history participants. Various aspects converge to present a narrative more violent, complex and globally significant compared to standard education.
The film maintains, represented more than local dispute over land, taxation and representation. Rather, the series depicts a violent confrontation that eventually involved multiple global powers and improbably came to embody termed “the noble aspirations of humankind”.
What had begun as a jumble of grievances aimed at the crown by American colonists throughout multiple disputatious regions quickly evolved into a bloody domestic struggle, pitting family members against each other and turning communities into battlegrounds. During the second installment, the historian Alan Taylor observes: “The main misapprehension regarding the Revolutionary War involves believing it represented that unified Americans. This omits the fact that it was a civil war among Americans.”
For him, the independence account that “for most of us is drowning in sentimentality and wistful remembrance and lacks depth and doesn’t have the respect actual events, every individual involved and the widespread bloodshed.”
It was, he contends, a movement that announced the revolutionary principle of the unalienable rights of people; a vicious internal conflict, dividing revolutionaries and royalists; and a global war, continuing previous patterns of wars between imperial nations for control of the continent.
Burns additionally aimed {to rediscover the
A tech enthusiast and business strategist with over a decade of experience in digital transformation and startup consulting.